Ethics and malpractice statement

„FORUM SCIENTIAE OECONOMIA”

Forum Scientiae Oeconomia is a peer-reviewed journal. The following statement presents the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles for this journal (the Authors, Reviewers and Editors).



Publication and authorship

  1. All published papers should be in accordance to the thematic scope of the journal, which includes the following areas: organizational theory, development and restructuring of organizations, strategic management, quality management, marketing organizational behaviour and culture, Human Resource Management, management systems and business models, Value Based Management, planning, development and management of computer systems, and application of information technology, finance and world economy, CSR, psychology and ethics in business.
  2. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-reviewing process by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  3. All papers published in the journal are written in English
  4. Any form of scientific fraud and the infringement of intellectual property rights will be disclosed.

 

Authors' responsibilities

  1. Authors must guarantee that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must guarantee that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must guarantee that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.  
  4. Authors must guarantee that the manuscript has been submitted with the full knowledge and approval of Institutions given as the affiliation of the authors.
  5. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  6. Authors must identify all sources used in the preparation of their manuscript.
  7. Authors assign copyright or license the publication rights in their articles, including abstracts, to WSB University.

 

Reviewers' responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. The reviewer must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Any kind of similarity between the manuscript and other published paper must be immediately brought in to notice to the Editor-in-Chief.
  3. Reviewers should be independent experts with no conflict of interest and relationships with any of the authors or institutions connected to the papers.
  4. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and the reviewers should express their views clearly with the supporting arguments and with no personal criticism of the author.
  5. In case, the reviewer feels that it is not possible to complete the review process, he/she must inform the Editor-in-Chief immediately so the manuscript could be sent to any other reviewer.

 

Editors’ responsibility

  1. Editor-in-Chief has a full responsibility and authority to reject an article at the stage of desk evaluation.
  2. Editor-in-Chief must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated. After passing this test, the manuscript is then forwarded to two reviewers for blind peer-review. Each of them will make a recommendation to accept/reject or modify the reviewed manuscript.
  3. Based on the review, Editor-in-Chief has the right to accept or reject the manuscript, or can send it for the modification,
  4. Editor-in-Chief must ensure that each manuscript is reviewed for its intellectual content.
  5. Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the content and overall quality of the publication.
  6. Editor-in-Chief must ensure that information regarding the manuscript is kept confidential.
  7. Editor-in-Chief should preserve the anonymity of reviewers and authors during the review process.
  8. Theme editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  9. Theme editors should base their decisions solely on the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope .
  10. Theme editors should act if they suspect misconduct and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  11. Theme editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.
  12. The final decision on the publication of a manuscript is taken by the Editor-in-Chief.