Reviewing rules


General rules

Reviewing scientific papers published in the "Forum Scientiae Oeconomia" is based on recommendations resulting from the publication of the Ministry of Science and High Education: Best Practices in the procedures of reviewing in science, Warsaw 2011.

Detailed rules

1. All papers submitted for publishing in the "Forum Scientiae Oeconomia" are to be evaluated in the process of review.

2. Review of scientific papers are made by competent people in a particular field or discipline (including foreign  reviewers)  not remaining in business, close personal relations and conflict of interest with the authors.

3. All reviews are confidential and anonymous  in accordance with the standards of double-blind review.

4. Review should be prepared according to the Template (download Review Tamplate).

5. Approval for publication depends on positive recommendations of reviewers.

6. If the reviewers suggest any amendments, the author should consider them.

7. The list of reviewers is published on the journal web page at the end of the year.

8.The proccess of review consists of the following steps:

 a. formal assessment carried out by the editor or the secretary of the Editorial Team. If the text does not meet the basic requirements of linguistic correctness and was not drafted in accordance with the editorial requirements - the author is informed.

b. scientific reviews of the two independent reviewers. Author will be informed of the outcome with a clear conclusion wther the article is accepted, rejected or minor/major revision is requested.

Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB
1c Cieplaka Street
41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
tel. +48 32 295 93 59
O platformie:
Copyright 2019 by Akademia WSB
OJS Support and Customization by LIBCOM
Platform & workfow by OJS/PKP