Personal and Institutional Barriers Perceived by Staff of Latvian Higher Educational Institutions in the Pro-cess of Digital Transformation: Pilot Survey Results

Jeļena Titko; Nataļja Verina; Julija Mironova; Kristine Uzule; Zanna Cernostana

doi:10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO1_5

Published : 2025-03-29

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025)

Personal and Institutional Barriers Perceived by Staff of Latvian Higher Educational Institutions in the Pro-cess of Digital Transformation: Pilot Survey Results

Jeļena Titko

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-0941

Nataļja Verina

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2106-8314

Julija Mironova

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-6220

Kristine Uzule

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-6069

Zanna Cernostana

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9366-1259

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO1_5

Abstract

The research goal is to evaluate personal and institutional barriers towards digital transformation (DT) as perceived by different groups of staff at Latvian higher educational institutions (HEIs). Initially, a comprehensive literature review was conducted, followed by a survey, using the research instrument (questionnaire) developed by the authors. Academic and administrative staff members from Latvian HEIs participated in the survey. For the purpose of evaluation, data were processed by means of frequency analysis and procedures of comparing independent samples. From the viewpoint of staff, the most significant institutional barriers to digital transformation are a lack of financial resources, a lack of time (lack of human resource capacity or overloading with existing tasks), and employees’ motivation in general. In turn, a lack of time, a lack of management support, and a lack of IT skills were identified as the most significant personal barriers. The research is limited by the sample size. However, this pilot study was aimed at technical testing of the measurement scale and preliminary testing of some hypotheses. Managers of higher educational institutions could use the results of the presented research to facilitate the digital transformation process and develop DT-related strategies. This research distinguishes itself from other research by the context (field of higher education) and localisation (there are a limited number of studies in the field of DT in Latvia).

Keywords:

higher education institution; digital transformation; barriers.

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Titko, J., Verina, N., Mironova, J., Uzule, K., & Cernostana, Z. (2025). Personal and Institutional Barriers Perceived by Staff of Latvian Higher Educational Institutions in the Pro-cess of Digital Transformation: Pilot Survey Results. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 13(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO1_5

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Alqahtani, J. S., Mendes, R. G., Triches, M. I., de Oliveira Sato, T., Sreedharan, J. K., Aldhahir, A. M., Alqarni, A. A., Raya, R. P., Alkhathami, M., Jebakumar, A. Z., AlAyadi, A. Y., Alsulay-yim, A. S., Alqahtani, A. S., Alghamdi, S. M., AlDraiwiesh, I. A., Alnasser, M., Siraj, R. A., Naser, A. Y., Alwafi, H., AlRabeeah, S. M., AlAhmari, M. D., Kamila, A., Bintalib, H., Alzah-rani, E. M., & Oyelade, T. (2023). Perspectives, practices, and challenges of online teaching dur-ing COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational survey. PLOS ONE, 9(8), Article e19102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.019102.

Antonopoulou, K., Begkos, C., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Staying afloat amidst extreme uncertainty: A case study of digital transformation in higher education. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 192, Article 122603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122603.

Bates, T. (2023). Key issues in teaching and learning resulting from the Covid‐19 pandemic. Natural Sciences Education, 52(1), e20118. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20118 .

Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Serna, A. M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature re-view. Sensors, 20(11), Article 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291.

Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital trans-formation in German higher education: student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1.

Boychuk, Y., Novikova, V., Opanasenko, Y., Olena, K., & Kostina, V. (2022). Pedagogical con-ditions for the introduction of blended learning technologies in Ukrainian higher education in-stitutions. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(3), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.3/596.

Carroll, M., & Constantinou, F. (2023). Teachers’ experiences of teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic. Research report. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/682359-teachers-experiences-of-teaching-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf.

Chao, N., Zhou, Y., & Yang, H. (2024). How does digital transformation affect the profitability of rural commercial banks? Helioyn, 10, Article e29412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29412.

Chen, L., Tu, R., Huang, B. X., Zhou, H., & Wu, Y. (2024). Digital transformation’s impact on innovation in private enterprises: Evidence from China. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9, Article 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100491.

Cheng, E. C. K., & Wang, T. (2023). Leading digital transformation and eliminating barriers for teachers to incorporate artificial intelligence in basic education in Hong Kong. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100171.

Del Rowe, S. (2017). Digital transformation needs to happen: The clock is ticking for compa-nies that have been unwilling to embrace change. CRM Magazine, 21(10). Retrieved from https://www.destinationcrm.com/Articles/Editorial/Magazine-Features/Digital-Transformation-Needs-to-Happen-Now-120789.aspx.

Egala, S. B., Amoah, J., Bashiru Jibril, A., Opoku, R., & Bruce, E. (2024). Digital transformation in an emerging economy: Exploring organizational drivers. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Arti-cle 2302217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2302217.

Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher educa-tion: Understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Re-search & Development, 36(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300.

European Commission (2017). Shaping Europe’s digital future. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/attitudes-towards-impact-digitisation-and-automation-daily-life.

Gaebel, M. & Morrisroe, A. (2023). The future of digitally enhanced learning and teaching in European HE institutions. European University Association absl. https://www.eua.eu/publications/reports/the-future-of-digitally-enhanced-learning-and-teaching-in-european-higher-education-institutions.html.

Gilch, H., Beise, A. S., Krempkow, R., Müller, M., Stratmann, F., & Wannemacher, K. (2020). Survey on the status of digitization at German higher education institutions. European Journal of Higher Education IT. Proceedings of EUNIS20 Virtual Congress 2020. https://www.eunis.org/download/2020/EUNIS_2020_paper_82.pdf.

Gobble, M. A. M. (2018). Digital strategy and digital transformation. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1495969.

Gkrimpizi, T., & Peristeras, V. (2022, October). Barriers to digital transformation in higher edu-cation institutions. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 154-160). https://doi.org/10.1145/3560107.3560135.

Hagel, J. (2019). Unleashing Motivation for Transformation. The Deloitte Center for the Edge. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/5124_Unleashing-motivation-for-transformation/DI_Unleashing-motivation-for-transformation.pdf.

Hassan, A. M., Negash, Y. T., & Hanum, F. (2024). An assessment of barriers to digital trans-formation in circular construction: An application of stakeholder theory. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(7), Article 102787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102787.

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., Finger, G., & Aston, R. (2015). Students’ everyday engagement with digital technology in university: Exploring patterns of use and ‘usefulness’. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2015.1034424.

Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesbock, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital trans-formation strategy. MIS Quarterly, 15, 151-173. https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.105447.

Jamah, A., Alnagrat, A., Ismail, R. C., Zulkarnain, S., Idrus, S., & Ali, U. (2022). The impact of digitalisation strategy in higher education: Technologies and new opportunities. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship, 12(1), 79–94.

KPMG (2018) The Transformational CIO. Harvey Nash/KPMG CIO Survey 2018. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/au/pdf/2018/harvey-nash-kpmg-cio-survey-2018-education-au.pdf.

Laganovska, E. (2021). Remote learning during the Covid-19 pandemic for students with learn-ing disabilities: challenges and opportunities. In: Human, technologies and quality of education, Riga, University of Latvia, 2021, (501-510). Ed. L. Daniela. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021.38.

Lakshmi, A. J., Kumar, A., Kumar, M. S., Patel, S. I., Naik, S. K., L., & Ramesh, J.V.N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in steering the digital transformation of collaborative technical education. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 34, Article 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2023.100467.

Licka, P., & Gautschi, P. (2017). The digital future of higher education - What does it look like and how can it be shaped? https://www.berinfor.ch/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2017-Survey-Berinfor-The_digital_future_of_higher_education.pdf.

Mall, A., & Haupt, T. C. (2022). A review of COVID-19's digitalisation of built environment education. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium for Engineering Education, Universi-ty of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856.

Mikheev, A., Serkina, Y., & Vasyaev, A. (2021). Current trends in the digital transformation of higher education institutions in Russia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4537–4551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10467-6.

Nimante, D. (2021). COVID-19 difficulties in the remote learning process and opportunities to overcome them: The perspective of future teachers. In: Human, technologies and quality of edu-cation, Riga, University of Latvia, 2021, (165-179). Ed. L. Daniela. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021 https://www.apgads.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/apgads/PDF/HTQE-2021/htqe.2021.12-Nimante.pdf.

Niu, Y., Wen, W., Wang, S., & Li, S. (2023). Breaking barriers to innovation: The power of digital transformation. Finance Research Letters, 51, Article 103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103457.

OECD (2023). Towards an ¬Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. OECD Digital education out-look 2023. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/12/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c827b81a.html.

PWC - PricewaterhouseCoopers (2020). Evaluation of the digitalization of higher education in-stitutions in Latvia. https://www.izm.gov.lv/lv/media/12854/download?attachment.

Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher education for the future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481.

Robertsone, G., & Lapina, I. (2022). Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Drivers, Suc-cess Factors, Benefits and Challenges. In: Human, technologies and quality of education, Riga, University of Latvia, 2022, (180-196). Ed. L. Daniela. 152–168. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022.11.

Rubene, Z., Daniela, L., Sarva, E., & Rudolfa, A. (2021). Digital transformation of education: Envisioning post-Covid education in Latvia. In: Human, technologies and quality of education, Riga, University of Latvia, 2022, (180-196). Ed. L. Daniela. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021.13.

Salamzadeh, Y. (Ed.). (2022). Digital Transformation: A Human-Centric Approach. Efe Akade-mi Yayınları.

Sandkuhl, K., & Lehmann, H. (2017). Digital transformation in higher education–The role of enterprise architectures and portals. Digital Enterprise Computing (DEC2017), Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn. pp. 49-60.

Schraeder, M., Swamidass, P. M., & Morrison, R. (2006). Employee involvement, attitudes and reactions to technology changes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(3), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190601200306.

Schwertner, K. (2017). Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1), 388–393. https://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.065.

Seifert, A., & Charness, N. (2022). Digital transformation of everyday lives of older Swiss adults: use of and attitudes toward current and future digital services. European journal of age-ing, 19(3), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00677-9.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229.

Seres, L., Pavlicevic, V., & Tumbas, P. (2018) Digital transformation of higher education: Com-peting on analytics. INTED2018 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.2348.

Tadesse, S., & Muluye, W. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system in developing countries: a review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 8(10), Article 103646. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.810011.

Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Pre-paring workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 620766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620766.

Uzule, K. & Verina, N. (2023). Digital barriers in digital transition and digital transformation: Literature review. Economics and Culture, 20(1) 125–143. https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2023-0011.

Van Der Schaft, A. H., Lub, X. D., Van Der Heijden, B., & Solinger, O. N. (2024). How em-ployees experience digital transformation: A dynamic and multi-layered sensemaking perspec-tive. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(5), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221123098.

Wang, K., Li, B., Tian, T., Zakuan, N., & Rani, P. (2023). Evaluate the drivers for digital trans-formation in higher education institutions in the era of Industry 4.0 based on decision-making method. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8, Article 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100364.

Wang, W., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Deveci, M., Moslem, S., & Coffman, D’M. (2024). Unveiling the implementation barriers to the digital transformation in the energy sector using the Ferma-tean cubic fuzzy method. Applied Energy, 360, Article 122756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122756.

Wang, Y., Hong, D., & Huang, J. (2023). A diffusion of innovation perspective for digital transformation on education. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 2439–2448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.235.

Wilms, K. L., Meske, C., Stieglitz, S., Decker, H., Froehlich, L., Jendrosch, N., Schaulies, S., Vogl, R., & Rudolph, D. (2017). Digital transformation in higher education - new cohorts, new requirements? 23rd Americas Conference on Information Systems. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Digital-Transformation-in-Higher-Education-New-New-Wilms-Meske/f0ae71f5a5058bfe64ffa2ca8a3e813b0cf7157e.