Revisiting Self-Determination Theory in the Prestige Economy of Science: Implications for Academic Motivation

Lukasz Sulkowski; Justyna Dziedzic; Sylwia Przytula; Robert Seliga

doi:10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO3_2

Published : 2025-09-30

Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025)

Revisiting Self-Determination Theory in the Prestige Economy of Science: Implications for Academic Motivation

Lukasz Sulkowski

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1248-2743

Justyna Dziedzic

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-0892

Sylwia Przytula

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-241X

Robert Seliga

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-904X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO3_2

Abstract

Academic motivation has traditionally been analysed through the lens of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which emphasises autonomy, competence, and relatedness as essential psychological needs. However, in contemporary higher education, the economy of prestige plays an increasingly influential role in shaping academic behaviour, recognition, and career progression. This study addresses the gap in understanding how prestige influences the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in academic contexts. The main aim of the study is to expand the theoretical framework of SDT by integrating the concept of prestige as a critical factor influencing academic motivation. The study develops a conceptual model that integrates prestige into SDT and empirically examines its operation through qualitative interviews with Polish academics, thus addressing a gap in motivation theory and contextualising it within the prestige economy of higher education. This qualitative study employed an interpretative–symbolic paradigm and conducted in-depth interviews with 11 academics from diverse disciplines and institutions in Poland. The data were analysed using thematic coding and triangulated by multiple researchers to ensure validity. The participants were selected purposively to capture a range of experiences related to academic motivation, prestige, and institutional dynamics. The findings reveal that prestige functions simultaneously as an intrinsic and extrinsic motivator. It enhances recognition, provides access to resources, and strengthens perceived competence and relatedness. However, it can also limit autonomy and creativity when academics align their work with dominant prestige norms. The study also finds that prestige shapes collaboration patterns, affects gendered access to academic recognition, and influences identity formation among scholars. By incorporating prestige into the SDT model, this paper offers a novel conceptual expansion of motivation theory in academia. It highlights how symbolic capital intersects with psychological needs and reveals the socio-cultural forces shaping motivation in higher education. This framework has implications for research on academic identity, resilience, and organisational behaviour. The study suggests that academic institutions should develop policies that support autonomy and intrinsic motivation while acknowledging the role of prestige. Strategies to balance recognition structures with individual well-being and ethical conduct are essential to fostering sustainable academic environments. The findings also inform leadership and policy-making in higher education regarding career evaluation systems and research funding mechanisms.

Keywords:

self-determination theory, academic motivation, prestige economy, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, higher education.

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Sulkowski, L., Dziedzic, J., Przytula, S., & Seliga, R. (2025). Revisiting Self-Determination Theory in the Prestige Economy of Science: Implications for Academic Motivation. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 13(3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL13_NO3_2

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950.

Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & De Vries, R. (2007). Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of U.S. scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.

Blackmore, P. (2015). Prestige in Academic Life. Excellence and Exclusion. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715780.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0011.

Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291.

Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalizing cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97.

Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2008). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Scientific collaboration on the internet (pp. 99-118). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/03061270505535.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2024). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.

Dziedzic, J., & Sułkowski, L. (2023). The Role of the Scientist’s Personal Brand in the Reflexive Construction of Organizational Identity. Discourses on Culture, 20(1), 199–228. https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2023-0016.

English, J. F. (2005). The economy of prestige: Prizes, awards, and the circulation of cultural value. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9003-x.

Eurostat. (2024). R&D expenditure – Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=R%26D_expenditure.

Gao, Z., & Yuan, R. (2024). Understanding professional vulnerability in an era of performativity: Experiences of EFL academics in mainland China. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989577.

González-Sauri, M., & Rossello, G. (2023). The Role of Early-Career University Prestige Stratification on the Future Academic Performance of Scholars. Research in Higher Education, 64, 58–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09679-7.

Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The stars are not enough: Scientists—their passions and professions. University of Chicago Press.

Jeno, L. M., Diseth, Å., & Danielsen, A. G. (2018). A prospective investigation of students' academic achievement and dropout in higher education: A self-determination theory approach. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1027–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1502412.

Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x.

Klahn Acuña, B., & Male, T. (2024). Toxic leadership and academics’ work engagement in higher education: A cross-sectional study from Chile. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(3), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221084474.

Kotera, Y., Conway, E., & Green, P. (2021). Construction And Factorial Validation of a Short Version of the Academic Motivation Scale. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 51(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1903387.

Kwiek, M. (2021). The prestige economy of higher education journals: A quantitative approach. Higher Education, 81(3), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y.

Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press.

Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022.

Li, L., & Tao, J. (2025). Academics’ identity struggles and professional agency in the transition to teaching in a professional master’s degree programme. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2025.2503825.

Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2017). The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08311.

Long, J. S. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. National Academy Press.

Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.

Morgan, A.C., LaBerge, N., Larremore, D.B. Galesic, M., Brand, J. E., & Clauset, A. (2022). Socioeconomic Roots of Academic Faculty. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 1625–1633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01425-4.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318.

OECD. (2023). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023: Enabling Transitions in Times of Disruption. OECD Publishing.

Olsen, A., & Mason, E. (2023). Perceptions of Autonomy: Differential Job Satisfaction for General and Special Educators Using a Nationally Representative Dataset. Teaching and Teacher Education, 123, Article 103999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103999.

Przytuła, S., Sułkowski, Ł., & Kulikowski, K. (2024). Human resource management in higher education institutions: an international perspective. Routledge.

Ross, P. M., Scanes, E., & Locke, W. (2023). Stress adaptation and resilience of academics in higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09829-1.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

Schmidt, E. K., & Langberg, K. (2007). Academic Autonomy in a Rapidly Changing Higher Education Framework: Academia on the Procrustean Bed? European Education, 39(4), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934390406.

Shengyao, Y., Jenatabadi, H. S., Mengshi, Y., Minqin, C., Xuefen, L., & Mustafa, Z. (2024). Academic resilience, self-efficacy, and motivation: The role of parenting style. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 55530. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55530-7.

Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2007). Understanding the adverse effects of legal education on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301014.

Shorey, S., Chua, C. M. S., & Yap Seng, C. (2023). Turbulent academic journey of female academics: a meta-synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(6), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2227862.

Sulkowski, L., & Dziedzic, J. (2023). Challenges of Academic Ethos: The Scientific Community’s Response to the Ostracism of Russian Scientists Following the Invasion of Ukraine. Journal of Intercultural Management, 15(1), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2023-0021.

Sulkowski, L. (2023). Managing the digital university: paradigms, leadership, and organization (p. 299). Taylor & Francis.

Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., Standage, M., & Spray, C. M. (2014). Motivational predictors of physical education students' effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.1.99.

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2.

Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050841141429.

Wellcome Trust. (2020). What researchers think about the culture they work in. https://wellcome.org/reports/what-researchers-think-about-research-culture.

Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2007). Collaboration structure, communication media, and problems in scientific work teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x.

Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1753627.

Woolston, C. (2019, November 13). PhDs: the tortuous truth. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03459-7.

Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. Transaction Publishers.