COVID-19 and organisational  performance: a quasi-longitudinal  and multilevel study of Greece

Anastasia A.  Katou

doi:10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_6

Published : 2021-12-28

Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021)

COVID-19 and organisational performance: a quasi-longitudinal and multilevel study of Greece

Anastasia A. Katou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_6

Abstract

Based on threat-rigidity theory, the purpose of this study is to examine the effect of organisational responses to COVID-19 on organisational performance, through the serially mediating mechanism of employee motivation and employee work engagement. The research analysis is based on two surveys referring to Greek organisations, which were conducted six months apart in 2020 and 2021. Using a quasi-longitudinal and multilevel structural equation modelling approach, the findings suggest that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a decline in organisational performance due to fear and uncertainty which weakened employee motivation. The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed a trend of organisational performance returning to its initial equilibrium. Based on these findings, which underline the meaning of the serially mediating mechanism of employee motivation and employee work engagement, the study has several theoretical and practical implications.

Keywords:

Organisational responses to COVID-19, employee motivation, employee work engagement, organisational performance, Greece

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Katou, A. A. . (2021). COVID-19 and organisational performance: a quasi-longitudinal and multilevel study of Greece. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 9(4), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.23762/FSO_VOL9_NO4_6

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

ACCA (2020), Covid-19 global survey: Inside business impacts and responses, London: Association of Chartered Certified Accountants.

Albrecht, S.L., Bakker, A.B., Gruman, J.A., Macey, W.H., Saks, A.M. (2015), Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1): 7-35.

Alvarez, F.E., Argente, D., Lippi, F. (2020), A simple planning problem for Covid-19 lockdown (No. W26981), National Bureau of Economic Research.

Amabile, T.M., Conti, R. (1999), Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing, The Academy of Management Journal, 42(6): 630–640.

Bailey, K., Breslin, D. (2021), The COVID-19 pandemic: What can we learn from past research in organizations and management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1): 3–6.

Bakker, L., Albrecht, S.L. (2018), Work engagement current trends, Career Development International, 23(1): 4-11.

Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. (2008), Towards a model of work engagement, Career Development International, 13(3): 209-223.

Bentler, P.M. (2005), EQS 6 structural equations program manual, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structural equations with latent variables, New York: Wiley.

Brown, T.A. (2015), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: The Guilford Press.

Byrne, B.M. (2012), Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, New York: Routledge.

CIPD (2021), Employee engagement and motivation, London: Charted Institute of Personnel and Development.

Couch, D.L. O’Sullivan B., Matatzky, C. (2020), What COVID-19 could mean for the future of work from home: The provocations of three women in the academy, Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S1): 266-275.

Delaney, J.T., Huselid, M.A. (1996), The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organisational performance, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949–69.

Dyer, L., Reeves, T. (1995), Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go?, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3): 656–70.

European Commission (2021), Next generation EU (assessed 13 September 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_4068).

George, B., Sims, P., McLean, A.N., Mayer, D. (2007), Discovering your authentic leadership, Harvard Business Review, 85(2): p129-138.

Gerhart, B., Wrigth, P.M., McMaham, G.C., Snell, S.A. (2000), Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: how much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates?, Personnel Psychology, 53(4): 803-834.

Guest, D.E. (2001), Human resource management: When research confronts theory, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(7): 1092–106.

Hair, F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., Black, W. (2010), Multivariate data analysis with readings, Hoboken, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Iszatt-White, M., Kempster, S. (2019), Authentic leadership: Getting back to the roots of the ‘root construct’?. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3): 356–369.

Ivancevich, J.M., Konopaske, R., Matteson, M.T. (2005), Organizational behavior and management. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Katou, A.A. (2018), Examining the impact of employee core self-evaluations and organisational trust on work engagement. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(3): 83-100.

Katou, A.A., Budhwar, P.S., Patel, C. (2014), Content vs. process in the HRM-performance relationship: An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 53(4): 527-544.

Koszela, A. (2020), The influence of staff turnover on work motivation and job performance of employees in IT sector: The results of empirical research. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(1): 29-48.

Kozlowski, S.W., Klein, K.J. (2000), A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K.J. Klein and S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass (pp. 3-90).

Krammer, S.M.S. (2021), Navigating the New Normal: Which firms have adapted better to the COVID-19 disruption? Technovation,

doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102368

Lai, X., Li, F., Leung, K. (2013), A Monte Carlo study of the effects of common method variance on significance testing and parameter bias in hierarchical linear modeling, Organizational Research Methods, 16(2): 243–269.

Linnenluecke, M.K. (2017), Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1): 4–30.

Lockwood, N.R. (2010), Motivation in Today’s Workplace: The Link to Performance. Research Quarterly, Berea, OH: Society for Human Resource Management.

MacLeod, D., Clarke, N. (2009), Engaging for Success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement, Surrey: A report to Government.

Muthen, L.K., Muthen, B.O. (2017), Mplus computer software, Los Angeles, CA: Muthen and Muthen.

Phillips, J.J. (1996), Accountability in human resource management, Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.

Pinder, C.C., Harlos, K.P. (2001), Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331–369.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.

Richardson, R., Thompson, M. (1999), The Impact of people management practices on business performance: A literature review. London: IPD.

Rogers, E.W., Wright, P.M. (1998), Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: problems, prospects, and performance information markets, Human Resource Management Review, 8(3): 311–31.

Saks, A.M., Gruman, J.A. (2017), Human resource management practices and employee engagement, In Sparrow, P. Cooper, C.L. (Eds), A Research Agenda for Human Resource Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (pp. 95-113).

Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M. (2007), Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs, Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(2): 177-196.

Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., Bakker, A.B. (2002), The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1): 71–92.

Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., Dutton, D.E. (1981), Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4): 501–524.

Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., Van Veldhoven, M. (2012), Employee well-being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4): 391–407.

Young, J., Gifford, J. (2021), Employee engagement: An evidence review. Scientific summary. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

Wynen, J., Kleizen, B., Verhoest, K., Lægreid, P., Rolland V. (2020), Just keep silent… Defensive silence as a reaction to successive structural reforms, Public Management Review, 22(4): 498-526.

Zimmermann, A. (2011), Interpersonal relationships in transnational, virtual teams: Towards a configurational perspective, International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1): 59–78.