References
Braudel, F. (1981), Civilization and capitalism, Vol. I: The structures of every-day life, London: William Collins, Sons & Co.
Braudel, F. (1983), Civilisation and capitalism, Part II: The wheels of com-merce, Book Club Associates, London: William Collins, Sons & Co.
Diamond, P.E. (1965), National debt in a neoclassical growth model, The Amer-ican Economic Review, 55(5): 1126-1150.
Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R., Timmer, M.P. (2015), The next generation of the penn world table, American Economic Review, 105(10): 3150-3182.
Francis, J.G., Francis, L.P. (2011), Rights variation within a federalist system: un-derstanding the importance of mobility, Political Research Quarterly, 64: 82-93.
Fraser, N. (1990), Rethinking the public sphere. A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, Social Text, 25/26: 56-80.
Habermas, J. (1996), Between facts and norms. Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1979), Communication and the evolution of society, Boston: Bea-con Press.
Habermas, J. (1975), Legitimation crisis, Boston: Beacon Press.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1966), A general theory of rational behavior in game situations – Econometrica, 34(3): 613-634.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1953), Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk – taking, The Journal of Political Economy, 61(5): 434-435.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1967), Games with incomplete information played by “Bayes-ian” players. Part I: The basic model, Management Science, 14(3): 159-182.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1968), Games with incomplete information played by “Bayes-ian” players. Part II: Bayesian equilibrium points, Management Science, 14(5): 320 -334.
Hart, H.L.A. (1961), The concept of law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heath, S. (1957), Citadel, market, and altar. Emerging society. Outline of so-cionomy, The new natural science of society, Baltimore: The Science of Society Foundation.
Hodgson, G.M. (1993), Institutional economics: surveying the ‘old’ and the ‘new’, Metroeconomica, 44(1): 1-28.
Hodgson, G.M. (2006), Institutional economics, the individual actor and insti-tutional change, For the Alexander von Humboldt lecture at the University of Nijmegen, 5 December: 1-20.
Hodgson, G.M. (2000), The essence of institutional economics, Journal of Eco-nomic Issues, 2: 317-329.
Janeba, E. (2006), Moral federalism, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5(1): 1-27.
King, L.A. (2005), The federal structure of a republic of reasons, Political The-ory, 33: 629 -653.
McCallum, H.S. (1970), The art of community, Institute for Humane Studies, Inc. Menlo Park.
Meade, J.E. (1958), Is the national debt a burden?, Oxford Economic Papers, 10(2): 126 -150.
Modigliani, F. (1961), Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt, Economic Journal, 71: 730-755.
Parsons, T., Shils E.A., Smelser, N.J. (Eds.) (1965), Toward a general theo-ry of action: Theoretical foundations for the social sciences, Transaction Publishers.
Rif kin, J. (2014), The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism, Macmillan.
Schlatter, R. (1951), Private property, the history of an idea, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, New York-Toronto-London: McGraw-Hill.
Searle, J.R. (2005), What is an institution?, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1: 1-22.
Selten, R. (1975), Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Journal International Journal of Game Theory, 4(1): 25-55.
Weingast, B. (1981), Regulation, reregulation, and deregulation: the political foundations of agency clientele relationships, Law and Contemporary Prob-lems, 44(1): 147-177.
Weingast, B. (1995), The economic role of political institutions, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11(1): 1-31.
Weingast, B.R., Shepsle, K.A., Johnsen, C. (1981), The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics, The Journal of Political Economy, 89(4): 642-664.